BEC Celebrates the Global Day of Parents

In honor of the Global Day of Parents (June 1, 2023), let’s take a look at research by BEC member Food for the Hungry (FH) that analyzes communities strengthened through education across 10 countries. Below, FH’s Lisa Easterbrooks, Director of Education Programs, outlines the most recent findings on their community-based “care group” interventions.

The United Nations reported that 1.6 billion learners in more than 190 countries were affected by the closure of educational institutions at the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic. Between February 2020 and February 2022, educational systems were fully closed for in-person schooling for an average 141 days.

As a result, the World Bank estimates the percentage of children who cannot read a simple story by age 10 has increased to 70% since onset of the pandemic. All progress that was achieved toward mitigating learning poverty in low- and middle-income countries since 2000 has been lost.

Millions of children and youth now face the challenge of catching up on lost learning. Food for the Hungry (FH) is working with caregivers, teachers, and communities to improve child learning and development through social behavior change interventions.

FH recognizes that school-based approaches alone are not sufficient in many low- and middle-income countries to reach the goal of young children learning foundational skills. As a result, broadening the scope of education interventions beyond the school is a necessary step. This is where FH’s Education Care Groups come into play.

Care Groups consist of 10–15 community-based volunteer educators who meet regularly with project staff for training. They then facilitate behavior-change lessons to their neighbors in group settings and through household visits. Care Groups build caregiver capacity to support their children’s early child development and early-grade success.

FH staff involved in Care Groups for education have seen caregivers receive the information and use it in their own lives, in addition to the everyday lives of their children. One FH staff member said, “Before, they (caregivers) didn’t have time to think about their children’s studies. But since joining Care Groups, they are always trying to find time to help children.”

A staff member observed during a home visit that a father was carving a toy helicopter for his child. This shows that parents have learned the importance of play for child development and have found ways to make toys with locally available materials. FH staff is encouraged by this and say they “have hope that children will have their future with education. I think this program helps us to achieve our goal in every corner.”

Recent research by FH and Boston College’s School of Social Work has shown promising results of the impact of Care Groups on child learning outcomes. Researchers analyzed data sets from 10 countries that included data from a caregiver survey, as well as child learning outcomes measured by the International Development and Early Learning Assessment (IDELA) for children 3-6 yrs, and the Citizen Led Assessment (CLA) for children 7-15 yrs.

Researchers first compared two groups - caregivers who participated in Care Groups for education and those who did not, and correlated that with a caregiver behavior score, which was a sum score of multiple targeted learning support behaviors. These behaviors included:

-       Setting a specific space for study in the home

-       Reading with your child every day

-       Meeting with your child’s teachers

-       Singing songs and telling stories with your children

-       Playing with your children

-       Checking your children’s homework

-       Enrolling your children in school at the recommended age

The correlation analysis revealed a statistically significant positive association between participation in Care Groups and caregiver behavior scores.

Researchers also analyzed the learning outcomes of children of the caregivers who participated in Care Groups and found that these children had higher scores on IDELA and CLA than children of caregivers who did not participate. Additionally, researchers found stronger correlations between caregiver behavior scores and child learning outcomes, when compared to participation alone. 

In summary, caregivers who participate in community-based platforms that integrate social behavior change science, such as Care Groups, and adopt the early learning support behaviors have children who tend to score higher on learning assessments. Caregivers continue to be an important partner in the learning and development process.

Celebrating Teacher Appreciation Week with a Global Teacher and Teacher Coach Study

In honor of teacher appreciation week, let’s take a look at a fascinating global teacher and teacher coach study conducted by BEC member Teach for All. Below, Robbie Dean (Teach for All’s Global Director of Research, Evaluation & Network Learning and BEC’s Monitoring, Evaluation, Research, and Learning Co-Chair) shares about their first pilot effort to implement applied research to learn about the Teaching As Collective Leadership framework.

As a member of Teach For All’s research team, I support our network to explore an ambitious learning and research agenda on the impact of collective leadership development and how to accelerate the impact of teachers to develop classrooms that cultivate students as leaders of a better future. In partnership with the Jacobs’ Foundation, our team is working to build our global network’s internal research capability and experimenting with how we incorporate new forms of evidence generation and feedback into our approach to network learning, in addition to providing feedback on important learning questions associated with our Teaching As Collective Leadership (TACL) initiative, a framework for developing students as leaders that includes actionable and locally customizable guidance for teachers, teacher coaches, and program designers who are oriented towards this different view of the purpose of education.

The Global Teacher and Teacher Coach Study marks our first pilot effort to implement applied research to learn about the Teaching As Collective Leadership framework. The study data is from 48 teachers and 24 teacher coaches representing nine network partners across varied contexts. Our study investigates to what extent teachers develop mindsets aligned with collective leadership, and what kinds of classroom strategies they engage in as a result of exposure to the TACL model. In 2022, we tested two different delivery methods of the TACL framework: a series of workshops between teachers and their teacher coaches, and a comparison group of teachers and their teacher coaches in which we provided virtual instructions on how to use the TACL framework and resources. Both the intervention and comparison groups were designed to emulate common ways Teach For All offers learning experiences and insights on teacher development to our network partners.  

In both groups, we engaged with teachers and teacher coaches from across the Teach For All network to implement insights, mindsets, and instructional strategies in their classrooms based on the TACL framework. Recently, the study was featured in an episode of the BOLD Podcast, which highlighted the experiences of three network teachers: Aljawhara Al Athba from Teach For Qatar, Isaac Galindo from Enseña por México, and Ganiyat Muritala Wuraola from Teach For Nigeria. These stories provide a snapshot of the innovations that teachers and their teacher coaches are implementing in their classrooms to foster student leadership, including more concerted efforts to support students’ sense of belonging, a greater emphasis on strong teacher-student relationships, and strategies for social and emotional learning development. Hear more about their suggested strategies for other teachers in this podcast.

Our study report is helping our global network to learn more about the enabling conditions to support teachers to develop students as leaders. The following are a few major insights from both quantitative and qualitative data:

  • Teacher mindsets are highly aligned with TACL already, and they also can strengthen over time: Overall, both teacher groups (our treatment and comparison group) tended to score high in terms of their mindsets—such as their beliefs in community as a source of power and the extent to which educational inequity is systemic—suggesting that teachers may have already had strong alignment with the beliefs and mindsets associated with TACL prior to engaging with the framework. Nevertheless, our analysis indicates some evidence that more frequent exposure to TACL concepts may in fact increase these mindsets over a short time period.

  • Teacher coaches are key: Unilaterally, we heard from teachers that their teacher coaches were key in supporting them to apply the TACL framework. We also heard from teachers whose teacher coaches consistently applied the tools and resources and provided feedback, that they felt they had stronger knowledge of the framework and also noticed more shifts in their mindsets and changes in their actions. We hear this consistently in the stories shared by the teachers interviewed in the BOLD podcast. 

  • Opportunities for teachers to share their experiences with other educators matter: Many teachers and their teacher coaches shared that they deeply appreciated and learned from discussing their experiences in the classroom with other teachers and teacher coaches from across the network, in particular those who participated in the intervention group. 

  • There is strong evidence from the network that teachers are fostering environments to empathize and connect with their students: We’ve demonstrated evidence that teachers in our study quickly adopted strategies related to building strong, empathetic relationships with their students. We heard from teachers and coaches that they learned more about the importance of building meaningful relationships with students through the experience, and this came out clearly in interviews. 

We also received constructive feedback and challenging findings from our data and from the experiences of our teachers and teacher coaches in this study. For instance, we found fewer indications than expected of teacher strategies that emphasize student-driven learning and student autonomy in the classroom. This may be an area for further intervention to help teacher coaches and teachers create plans for more holistic approaches to employing multiple strategies in the classroom with equal emphasis. We also heard from teachers and teacher coaches that they would like to have more time to first internalize the model and make meaning of this framework, and additional time to implement and reflect on how the model works in their own classrooms to help strengthen student leadership. We are confident that this feedback and the iterative design process we are taking with the TACL team is helping us to strengthen the framework and resources, and providing our research team with new tools and opportunities to apply a new adaptive research and learning approach. 

The Global Teacher and Teacher Coach Study is just the second of three evidence generation/feedback activities around the Teaching As Collective Leadership Framework in partnership with Jacobs Foundation. In 2021, we preceded this study by a beta-testing of TACL tools. One important limitation of our study is that it did not aim to evaluate the potential effects of the model and interventions on students. For our future research, we will strive to determine whether these shifts in mindsets and teacher actions lead to improvements in holistic student learning outcomes by working with a network partner (Enseña por Colombia) to adapt and implement programmatic changes to its training and support of teachers in 2023 and 2024. We are excited to continue to learn and share our insights from our adaptive learning and research strategy with practitioners within and beyond our global network.

Collaborating in a big way for the littlest ones: the road to revise Senegal’s pre-primary curriculum

Written by Fabiola Lara (Save the Children) and Pape Sow (Executive Assistant to the Commissioner for Human Development and Social Affairs at the Economic Community of West African States, formerly Save the Children)

Photo Credit: Save the Children

Many roads as of late seem to start at the onset of COVID-19 but this one starts much earlier. In March 2019, Save the Children led a Ready to Learn (formerly ELM)[1] training for Save the Children staff and Ministry of Education inspectors in Dakar, Senegal. One year later, COVID-19 was upon us and, while we were all thinking about what future lies ahead for us, we were especially concerned for young children, the “littlest” ones, and how the pandemic would impact future learning outcomes and opportunities for quality pre-primary education.

Recognizing the impact that pre-primary education has on future grades and lifelong learning, in March 2021, through a World Bank-funded project known as Investing in the Early Years for Human Development Project in Senegal (PIPADHS), Save the Children, in close collaboration with the Government of Senegal, set out to revise the national pre-primary curriculum for all three levels of pre-primary – petite section, moyenne section, and grande section. This project focused on children ages 3-5 years old, reaching a total of 122,352 children (16.3% of the general school-aged population, with young girls representing 49.8%). It was a massive undertaking, as the last time that the pre-primary curriculum had been revised was in 2008.

As part of the curriculum revision process, a Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats (SWOT) analysis was completed early on to identify priorities for the revision and ways to make the curriculum responsive to present-day global challenges, as well as Senegalese society. A benchmarking study[2] was then completed to assess curricula from countries in the Africa region and to understand regional pre-primary priorities. The study outlined commonalities in curricula across Ghana, Rwanda, Cameroon, Ethiopia, and Tanzania. A key finding of this study was that, while these five countries had many differences, the following were central themes. The curricula were:

  • Competency-based. This means that the curricula are designed with the goal to develop general or specific competencies among children – in some cases, these competencies are cross-cutting across various levels of education.

  • Focused on various learning domains. These include literacy, numeracy, social-emotional development, etc. Some are holistic in nature (i.e. not only focusing on ‘academic’ domains) but others have more narrowly defined domains such as science and technology.

  • Structured around different themes or topics. These include topics such as “me and my family”, “the world around me”, “my country”, etc.

  • Standard-based. They include specific achievement standards for the children from each age group.

  • Inclusive of a detailed list of activities. This offers support to teachers in order to help children achieve standards outlined.

  • Inclusive of guidance around schedule and timing. The curricula contain an indication of how much time should be allocated to each theme, how long the periods should be, etc.

  • Inclusive of assessment guidance. The curricula provide some guidance around child assessment.

Soon after, a series of workshops were conducted to define the new learning domains and format of the newly-revised curriculum across the three levels of preprimary. Technical teams were established to work on the different sections of the curriculum according to the following new learning domains: Language and Literacy, Mathematics, Discovery of the World, Social-Emotional Development and Overall Well-Being, Psychomotor Development, and the Arts. Save the Children’s two evidence-based technical approaches, Ready to Learn[3] and Social Emotional Learning Foundations (SELF), were integrated as part of the revision process. Ready to Learn provides caregivers and teachers with guidance on how to support the development of foundational emergent literacy and math skills among young children (ages 3-6 years) while SELF focuses on promoting social engagement, self-management, and emotional awareness in young children.

Some key milestones of the project included:

  1. From May 2021 to August 2021, the new set of learning domains were proposed and refined, development of technical materials for all three preprimary levels was completed, and objectives for pilot testing of portions of new curriculum was finalized.

  2. From November to December 2021, Ministry Inspectors participated in a training of trainers (ToT) led by Save the Children based on the new curriculum. Following the ToT, teachers in three regions of Senegal (Fatick, Saint-Louis, and Kolda) received training from Ministry Inspectors in preparation for the “mini-pilot.”

  3. On December 2021, a “mini-pilot” was conducted to test different portions of the curriculum – mainly language and literacy as well as mathematics as these were the two areas that were identified as lowest achieving in learning outcomes for preprimary children.

  4. From March 2022 to April 2022, adaptations were made to the curriculum materials to include lessons learned from the “mini-pilot” and more finalized versions of the curricula were completed for further technical review.

Feedback from the “mini-pilot” was promising – the materials were well received by teachers but further modifications were identified. Upon delivering the curriculum in April 2022, the Ministry of Education and Save the Children had discussions on conditions for successful implementation going forward:

  1. Need for effective leadership that is capable of transformation and supported by professionals driving a social and political demand for change. This includes capacity building activities in all areas to ensure adequate planning, implementation, monitoring and evaluation of the progress of the desired change.

  2. Adopt a system approach that not only favors learners and the classroom but also integrates essential contributions of the school, inspections, training institutions, the Education, communities, and families.

  3. Real change is based on rigorous planning and implementation, a solid database, effective evaluation and a continuous learning system. This means not only creating the possibility of influencing the content of the strategies proposed but also facilitating conditions conducive to their gradual up-take. An evaluation of the new curriculum after two years of scaling up and the lessons learned from this exercise will guide the consolidation and sustainability of the transformation system and enable us to verify our hypotheses of change.

  4. Finally, increase provision of the necessary resources for successful implementation of the desired changes. All changes have a cost. It will be important to rigorously evaluate them and ensure that the necessary resources are put in place at each phase of the change implementation process.

Currently, the Department of Preschool Education (DEPS) is leading further revisions to the preprimary curriculum across the three levels and last month, teachers were trained on the new curriculum to be implemented in the following seven of the 14 regions of Senegal: Matam, Tambacounda, Kolda, Fatick, Kaolack, Kaffrine, and Diourbel. The implementation of the new curriculum is expected to produce critical insights on what is working and how the revised curriculum can be improved to further address the needs of children. This is a pivotal moment to shape future generations of children in Senegal and to provide them with the skills they need to thrive as they progress through the school system and beyond into adulthood.


[1] Save the Children. 2018. Ready to Learn: Common approaches. Retrieved from: https://resourcecentre.savethechildren.net/pdf/ready-to-learn-2-pager.pdf/

[2] Chakhaia, Lela and Abimpaye, Monique. 2021. Overview of Pre-primary Curricula in Selected Countries in Sub-Saharan. Save the Children US: Washington, D.C.

[3] Amente, A., Yenew, A., Borisova, I., Dowd, A. J., Pisani, L., Dang, S., & Anís, K. (2017). Save the Children’s Emergent Literacy and Mathematics Initiative: Supporting Educators’ and Parents’ Efforts to Improve Young Children’s School Readiness. YC Young Children, 72(4), 31-34.